also not quite knitting

Jun. 3rd, 2026 10:22 pm
thistleingrey: (Default)
[personal profile] thistleingrey
I realized this week, while waiting, that a while-waiting project is still needed---something that could indeed drag on for months unhindered, but also, something that needs only one active skein of yarn and few or no instructions. (Not a cardigan-puzzle, and not the MKAL wrap.)

The sloppy handspun that was a tourist-traveler gift is too uneven to suit Lille Kolding. The WIP is, or was, awkwardly dense with the needle size I was using, and if sized up, it'd become too floppy in Kolding's brioche section.

Now that the most recent bout of waiting has led to completion of a Grainwise, I think that the pattern's mostly garter-stitch construction might forgive the handspun's unevenness. It's written for MCN (merino-cashmere-nylon) and I've used a wool-silk blend, but it's fine if the handspun isn't transformed into something swish. It should just become something other than a felted lump or, like, compost.

Also, Lille Kolding is more boring than Grainwise to knit, for me---how the design is put together, not what the finished product looks like.

This type of thing is why we need thoughtfulness regarding diversity in all domains, not only knitting design, where it isn't really crucial. In other words, it's great that many different scarf/shawl patterns exist.

Pushing myself through making one Lille Kolding was okay. The process of it nixed my willingness to plod through Architexture, which was meant as a while-waiting project, sat for months, and then was undone last month. Several knitters have commented on Rav that it's soothing and rhythmic. For me it just feels tedious, and given that I must listen closely sometimes while waiting, any project had better not put me to sleep. I imagine that some knitters would find Grainwise boring or tedious instead.
numb3r_5ev3n: 7 from Matrix Online (Default)
[personal profile] numb3r_5ev3n posting in [community profile] dreamwidthlayouts
I did check the tags before posting this, but I didn't see anything. There are a lot of styles that look great on a computer, but condense the text/entry area to a narrow vertical column when read on a mobile device. Mobility seems to be the best one for mobile (obviously) but I kind of hate the way it looks on a computer. Does anyone know a decent theme which allows for some customization (like custom backgrounds) but looks decent and reads decently on a mobile device? Or is there something I can throw into the custom CSS section of the customize theme page to fix this? I'd love to use the 5 AM theme, but it kind of looks like crap on my phone. Thanks in advance.

EDIT: I have switched back to Practicality. Thanks for your feedback, everyone.

not quite stitching yet

May. 31st, 2026 11:38 am
thistleingrey: (Default)
[personal profile] thistleingrey
Since the prior post had no pattern links, heh:

The jettison alternative to trying to make something that fits me passably, btw, would be to knit a deliberate bag of a pullover. Unlike Junko Okamoto's The Twigs, which I sized up, steeked into a cardigan, and then gave to my mother, Okamoto's Hana is loose, comes with a schematic diagram of garment measurements, and isn't a bunch of fussy (though lovely) colorwork.

I mean, I bet I could knit my mother a suitably chic Hana without blinking, though not for myself. Rather than give up before I start, a cardigan is next and not a pullover-bag. Davies' Yorlin has superficial similarities to a different designer's failed cardigan, Meris, which I tried, modified, and dropped a decade ago. Neither cardigan is fitted, strictly speaking; they drape from the shoulder-yoke, raglan for Yoris and set-in sleeve for Meris (though one wouldn't know it from the last Meris pic, a spring-green cardigan worn by the designer at what looks to be one pattern-size too snug). Yorlin's plain back should ease my task.

Though most top-down cardigans start in directly with the neckline, I think the only way through for me is to do a provisional (crochet) cast-on, to separate a tidy neckband-to-be from the looser stitches needed to traverse my trapezius---and to avoid casting on multiple times just to guess how many stitches may be necessary. It'll allow a neater finish, also, which is why some (actual) designers choose it, but I want it for its hacky, decide-later facilitation.

current stitching

May. 30th, 2026 09:59 pm
thistleingrey: (Default)
[personal profile] thistleingrey
Having knitted my cardigan WIP a bit past the armholes (top down), I can see without finishing the body section that the yoke is almost. That is a complete sentence. It's a compromise between the designer's proportions as described and a pattern that would be marketable for other knitters.

It's much closer than patterns usually go to my proportions (I knitted it without modification and can put the WIP on without tugging at it---that's a first!), but close not enough to justify knitting the entire garment. Were I to modify it, I'd just need to rewrite the stitch counts into something that no one else would want. :) I may yet, but not now.

The obvious thing to knit next is another cardigan. I'd like to try rewriting a pattern that will definitely in no way fit me as written, so that it doesn't look almost close enough on the needles and then become another disappointment. For that, the best choice is a pattern with no shoulder depth---hello again to Kate Davies' generally thoughtful work. I have a pattern in mind as a basis, and suitable yarn (repurposed from a failed cardigan, then a boring scarf) for at least a yoke-sized swatch.

Because thinking only about garments is hard, I'm also re-contemplating something released originally as a mystery knit-along. The other parts of its thematic set were completed more than a year ago---the original plan was to make statement shawls for two longtime friends and me, unrelated to any potential milestone-birthday years. Theirs were finished somewhat later than intended, after the pattern of one shawl had to be changed and my current hands proved terrible for deadline estimates. My shawl was begun this week.
white_aster: (bullshit sinfest)
[personal profile] white_aster

Ars Technica: Proposed new US funding rules: We can cancel any grant at any time

 Peer review now optional, political staff would screen grants for forbidden topics.

 

This is slowly spreading everywhere as anyone interested in getting a US grant, ever, becomes increasingly alarmed at the 400+page turd of proposed regulations that was dropped on the Federal Register.

Seriously, if you care about the US science enterprise at all, in any field, please read this, and also this one by Elizabeth Ginexi who similarly notes the most hair-raising proposals.  And also here, where she talks about what to do next (comment on the turd!  Do it!  It's easy!  And will help!)


Page generated Jun. 5th, 2026 11:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios